NOTICE
TO CONTRIBUTORS - Butterfly Records for the
T.E.A. Annual Lepidoptera Summary
By
Colin Jones
Introduction
If possible, we are asking that contributors to the annual summary
submit their records in electronic format, preferably within a spreadsheet
program such as Microsoft Excel. The advantages of such a system are many. For
example, such a system allows for much easier storage, sorting and analysis of
records. It also allows the records to be mapped quickly and easily (providing
that they also contain a geographic coordinate). The records of rare species
will also be incorporated into the rare species databases at the Natural
Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) where they will be used for a variety of
conservation-related projects and land-use planning.
VERY IMPORTANT NOTE: Although we
strongly encourage the submission of data using the method outlined below, we
do recognize that such a system might be foreign and impossible for some. We
will continue to accept records submitted in other formats but strongly
encourage this system if possible. We are more than happy to provide any
assistance needed in order to get people started with this format.
How
To Submit Records
As mentioned above, if possible, please submit records using the format
and field identifiers indicated in the accompanying Microsoft Excel spreadsheet
template (see also below under specific format suggestions). If Microsoft Excel
is not available, another spreadsheet or database program will suffice (e.g.
dBase). Submitting records in electronic form saves a great deal of time and is
the best method. If the contributor does not have access to a spreadsheet or
database program, then the data can be typed in a word processor such as
Microsoft Word. If a computer is not available, hand written sheets will
sufficeplease contact us if you would like a copy of a form for hand-written
records.
Most identifications are likely to be based on adults, but records of
larvae are also most welcome. Tentative records may be acceptable, but must be
indicated as such with a question mark after the species name. Contributors
should be prepared to discuss the validity of their submitted records with the
compilers who are responsible for ensuring a high standard of accuracy.
Mandatory Data Fields
Observation Date (OBS_DATE) - please use the following format if
possible (year-month-date - eg. 2000-08-14). Please also ensure that the date
field is designated as a "text" field. The template included with
this package already has the fields formatted the correct way.
Scientific or
English Name - English names should be those featured in "The Butterflies of
Canada" by R.A. Layberry, P.W. Hall and J.D. Lafontaine. This list can be
found on the internet at http://www.cbif.gc.ca/spp_pages/butterflies/taxonomy_e.php
. Scientific names should follow "Butterflies of North America: Scientific
Names List for Butterfly Species of North America, north of Mexico" by
P.A. Opler and A.D. Warren. It too can be found on the internet as a pdf file
at: http://www.biology.ualberta.ca/old_site/uasm//Opler&Warren.pdf
For the sake of
convenience, if anyone would like me to email them a listing of English and
Scientific Names for Ontario, I'd be happy to do so.
County (CTY) - Please
enter the first four letters in the name of the county or district, all in
block CAPITALS. Note that Haldimand-Norfolk are no longer amalgamated and are
now, once again considered separate counties. The country codes are:
ALGO Algoma
BRAN Brant
BRUC Bruce
COCH Cochrane
DUFF Dufferin
DURH Durham
ELGI Elgin
ESSE Essex
FRON Frontenac
GREY Grey
HALD Haldimand
HALI Haliburton
HALT Halton
HAMI Hamilton-Wentworth
HAST Hastings
HURO Huron
KENO Kenora
KENT Kent
LAMB Lambton
LANA Lanark
LEED Leeds & Grenville
LENN Lennox & Addington
MANI Manitoulin
METR Metropolitan Toronto
MIDD Middlesex
MUSK Muskoka
NIAG Niagara
NIPI Nipissing
NORF Norfolk
NORT Northumberland
OTTA Ottawa-Carleton
OXFO Oxford
PARR Parry Sound
PEEL Peel
PERT Perth
PETE Peterborough
PRES Prescott & Russell
PRIN Prince Edward
RAIN Rainy River
RENF Renfrew
SIMC Simcoe
STOR Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry
SUDB Sudbury
THUN Thunder Bay
TIMI Timiskaming
VICT City of Kawartha Lakes
WATE Waterloo
WELL Wellington
YORK York
Location a description
of the location using a prominent landmark is very useful. Some examples
include:
Toronto, High Park
Little Turtle Lake, S shore, 1 km W
of Mine Centre
UTM (Zone, Easting,
Northing, and NAD) OR.... Latitude & Longitude (LAT and
LONG) (see detailed notes below if more information is required on this system).
NOTE: If a UTM or Lat/Long absolutely cannot be derived, please send along the
record anyway. We can probably derive a UTM from the record given that we have
access to all of Ontario's Topographic maps.
UTM Source - it is helpful
to indicate how a UTM or Lat/Long was derived.
Options
include: a hand-held GPS unit (GPS) a
reading was taken from a topo map (TOPO MAP) or coordinates were derived from
Google Earth (GOOGLE EARTH)
Observer(s)
Number of Adults (ADULTS) and/or Number
of Immatures/Larvae (IMM)- for the number of adults field please use
the following style: # followed by and M for male, a F for female. If exact or
approximate numbers were not noted terms such as "a few" or
"several" or
"present" (indicating that this species was noted but numbers
were not) are fine.
Record Type (RECORD_TYPE) -
please use one of the following - Collected, Photographed, Caught and Released,
Sight Record
Optional (but useful) fields:
Township (TWP)
Notes - notes on
behaviour, clarification of numbers or photographs, any other information (note
that there is a separate field for habitat).
An example of something that might appear in the notes field is
something like: a female was noted ovipositing on Common Milkweed. The term in
copula can be used to indicate a mating pair.
Map Number (MAP_NO) - the
number of the relevant topographic map (i.e. NTS mapsheet) is useful but not
necessary
Map Square (MAP_SQUARE) -
not necessary as this can be populated automatically. For those people familiar
with breeding bird atlas work, this may be a field that you have recorded.
Habitat
Collection # - some
individuals who collect specimens assign a unique collection number to their
collections
Collection - if a specimen
was collected, this field indicates where the specimen resides.
eg. CNC (Canadian National Collection at
Agriculture Canada); ROM (Royal Ontario Museum); NHIC (Natural Heritage
Information Centre collection); CDJ (Colin D. Jones' personal collection).
Specimen
determined by (DET) - if a specimen exists, who determined or
identified the specimen
You may have
additional fields that you use for your own data management, and if this is the
case, by all means feel free to submit your records with or without these
fields.
When and where to send records
Normally, each year we'd like to receive all records by the end of January. For the 2008 season,
however, we are extending this deadline until March 6, 2009. This will provide
compilers with enough time to compile and produce the next volume so that it is
available prior to the following field season (and hopefully give you enough
time to prepare your records). If you can't get your records in by the
deadline, let us know the date when you think they could be delivered.
If submitting records via email please send them to both compilers:
Colin Jones colin.jones@ontario.ca
and Ross Layberry (rosslayberry@yahoo.ca).
Any hardcopy records should be sent to:
Colin D. Jones
Box 182
Lakefield, ON,
K0L 2H0
Tel (H):
705-652-5004
Tel (W):
705-755-2166
Email: colin.jones@ontario.ca
Additional
notes on Location Data (including UTM and Lat/Long)
Precise locations and corresponding geographic coordinates are very
important and will be the basis for any maps portrayed in a second edition of
the Ontario Butterfly Atlas.
IMPORTANT NOTE NUMBER TWO: Once again, we
recognize that for many contributors, generating and supplying geographic
coordinates (either a UTM or Lat/Long) will be foreign. Although we strongly
encourage contributors to supply such coordinates, it is not completely
mandatory. We would rather have the records without coordinates than no records
at all. In order to be able to accurately map these records (for example in the
Ontario Butterfly Atlas), they will have to be assigned geographic coordinates
either by you as a contributor or by those of us working on the atlas. It is
much more accurate, therefore for contributors to be supplying these
coordinates. Read on to learn how this can be done and keep in mind, once
again, that we are happy to provide any guidance required in order to help
people begin this process.
Locations should indicate a position through the use of a distance and
direction from a prominent landmark. A post office (indicated by the letter P
on a topographic map) is useful, but a distant post office is less useful than
a nearby one. A lake, river, or town can also be used. In order to aid in the
sorting of records, locations should begin with a prominent landmark, rather
than a number, street name or local name. For example, a particular collection
site may be described as "65 km W of Atikokan" but a more useful
description of this particular location would be "Little Turtle Lake,
south shore, 1 km W of Mine Centre". Little Turtle Lake is featured on
topographic maps, but because there could be several Little Turtle Lakes in
Ontario, indicating that it is 1 km W of Mine Centre is very helpful.
Accompanying a location name is either a UTM or a Latitude/Longitude,
both of which are coordinates used for mapping. Although UTM is preferable when
reading from a map, latitude and longitude (best expressed as decimal degrees;
e.g. 45.8156, -82.7557) is also acceptable.
A UTM is basically a numerical value that represents the precise
location of a site using a type of grid system. A UTM consists of three sets of
numbers. A two-digit "Zone", a six-digit "Easting", and a
seven-digit "Northing". Together, these three numbers refer to a
precise location. An example of a full UTM would be 17, 693455, 5071456.
Hand-held GPS (Global Positioning System) units are the easiest, and
most accurate way to generate a coordinate (either a UTM or Latitude and
Longitude) for a location, provided you are physically at that location with
your GPS unit. These units are relatively inexpensive, small in size and easy
to carry around in the field, and are available at most outdoors and camping
stores. They will display geographic coordinates in UTM, Latitude and
Longitude, or both.
A UTM grid reference can also be generated from an NTS (National
Topographic System) mapsheet. This method can be used regardless of whether or
not you are physically at the site. Such mapsheets are available at camping and
outdoors stores, as well as map stores. NTS maps are available at two scales,
1:50,000 and 1:250,000. A scale of 1:50,000 is the most useful for fieldwork.
More information on where to buy these maps can be found at: http://maps.nrcan.gc.ca/cmo/dealers.html.
Instructions on generating a UTM from an NTS mapsheet can be found at: http://maps.nrcan.gc.ca/maps101/grid_ref.html
or by contacting us. NTS mapsheets are also now available in digital format and
can be read using a computer software program called TouratechQV. This system
is excellent more information can be found at: http://www.ttqv.com/
When reporting a location using a UTM, there are two grid systems that
are used in Canada - NAD27 (North American Datum 1927) and NAD83 (North
American Datum 1983). The datum used on an NTS mapsheet is indicated on the
bottom of the map. In addition, when using a hand-held GPS unit, you can
program your unit to display the coordinates in either NAD27 or NAD83. It is
important to indicate the "datum" with any UTM coordinate because, in
Ontario, they differ by approximately 200 metres in the Northing (and a little
in the Easting). Naturally, NAD83 is the more up-to-date system and is
preferred, but as long as the datum system used is provided with the
coordinates, a conversion can be made.
Value of Observations
The preparation
of distribution maps and atlases depends on geographic data. Knowledge of
flight periods and habitat depend on observations at various stages at various
dates. Even after a species has been
recorded from a particular site, continuing observations from that site are
valuable in documenting fluctuations and changes and therefore may contribute a
great deal to our knowledge of the biology of butterflies. Such monitoring is very important with
respect to rare species and their habitats.
If a species is shown to be declining, it may be admitted to a risk
category by provincial and federal governments and then the program, funding
and planning necessary for retrieval from the risk category may be brought to
bear.
The larger and
more widespread the number of records, the more reliable the trend data. A few miscellaneous observations at a site
where it has already been reported may seem without value, but in concert with
many other observations they are a database that can be analyzed to produce new
information some of which may be beyond present imagination. Although observations of rare species and
indicator species are most important, all observations have a potential value.
Recording
observations is not a major chore. Since
an increasing number of people observe butterflies while doing other biology
work, or in recreation, they can easily contribute to science and conservation
by submitting at least some observations to a central database where they will
not be lost, but rather increase in value as part of a body of information that
can be analyzed and queried.
The annual
summary database produced by TEA has this general purpose, i.e. to make
observations valuable, useful and accessible for science and conservation, but
nor are we ruling out recreation, if for example someone wants to see or
photograph a particular species at its nearest location.